<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Impeach Witnesses by Creating an Effective Record at Depositions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trialtheater.com/wordpress/cross-examination/impeach-witnesses-by-creating-an-effective-record-at-depositions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trialtheater.com/wordpress/trial-skills/cross-examination/impeach-witnesses-by-creating-an-effective-record-at-depositions/</link>
	<description>Trial lawyers, discover how to persuade jurors and win your next jury trial.  You will learn valuable tips for improving your jury selection, opening statement, direct examination, cross-examination, and closing arguments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 06:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.trialtheater.com/wordpress/trial-skills/cross-examination/impeach-witnesses-by-creating-an-effective-record-at-depositions/comment-page-1/#comment-13249</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trialtheater.com/wordpress/?p=79#comment-13249</guid>
		<description>The tip on maintaining specific record of deposition is apt and commendable. No such record will be elegant and convincing if riddled with pockets of doubt as the first (bad) example shows. Thank you for the exposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tip on maintaining specific record of deposition is apt and commendable. No such record will be elegant and convincing if riddled with pockets of doubt as the first (bad) example shows. Thank you for the exposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

